Sunday, May 15, 2005
Remember in previous posts where I talk about the leftist lies about Rush Limbaugh and the "chelsea incident"?
Here and here.
Google is helping me find more, brand new examples of those lies (from a message board, now defunct, on cakewalk.com):
"I honestly don't know if he did it on the radio, but my dad watched him every day on TV, and believe me, the "White House Dog" comment occurred at least once per week-- essentially any commentary that referred to her"
Er, fella. Rush never said it once, much less "at least once per week."
Here on usenet, note this thread in which all the leftists contradict each other with different descriptions of the same oincident! One of which contradicts himself in one post!
From: "Larry Hewitt"-
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 20:03:43 -0400
Local: Mon,Apr 18 2005 8:03 pm
Subject: Re: Chelsea Clinton, Amy Carter, and the Bush Sluts
He said Rush, as in :imbaugh, who went on a crisade about Chelesea Clinton when she was 13. He ridiculed her school assignments and even called her the White House dog on his tv show.
The idiot denied he did that on his radio show until the tpe was played back.
So, again, repuglicons attack a 13 year old girl for being smart and gawky vs democrats repeat teh truth that the adult ush girls are drinken sluts.
BTW, it is repug;licons who are preaching values and family values, So what kind of values does this show?? What kind of parents were the Bushes who raised 2 drinken sluts
Did it on his radio show or tv show? Um, excuse me Larry? Can you make up your mind? And Larry, you're a liar. Rush did not deny the incident in question took place, nor did anyone contradict him with a replay of a tape of either show.
Here's more. Note that one post, by George Grapman" points out that a photo was shown of chelsea, and a few more posts down, "Lamont Cranston" contradicts this with a claim that Rush held up the photo. These leftists just cant keep their lies straight.
George Grapman Apr 18, 8:13 pm show options
Newsgroups: alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.rush-limbaugh
From: George Grapman - Find messages by this author
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:13:38 GMT
Local: Mon,Apr 18 2005 8:13 pm
Subject: Re: Chelsea Clinton, Amy Carter, and the Bush Sluts
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Larry Hewitt wrote:
> "jbeck" wrote in message
> news:4263ba6b@nntp.zianet.com...
>>"c-bee1" wrote in message
>>news:u0O8e.26173$8Z6.18430@attbi_s21...
>>>"jbeck" wrote in message
>>>news:4263387c@nntp.zianet.com...
>>>>
>>>>>The irony or should I say the Hypocrisy with these liberals here
>>>>>bashing
>>>>>the Bush daughters is, if no one ever heard anything about them at
> all,
>>>>>these same liberals would be saying they are quintessential oddities
>>>>>and
>>>>>don't experience life as most normal American kids growing up do. So
> in
>>>>>other words, liberals will bash anything that make them think they've
>>>hung
>>>>>an albatross around W's neck. But then again that's only their
>>>delusional
>>>>>perceptions which has nothing to do with reality!
>>>>I think you are absolutely correct. No matter what, they are going to
>>>bash
>>>>anything and everything associated, even remotely, with President Bush.
>>>>I have little personal respect for those who attack the kids of
> someone.
>>>I
>>>>think it is pretty pathetic on their part. It shows their lack of
>>>>ethics,
>>>>chivalry, or what have you to attack the children of those they
> disdain.
>>> Probably a parody on Rush, who did so repeatedly and then lied about it
>>>with a grin on his face. Of course, republicans had no problem when
> that
>>>happened.
>>Did what?
>>I have never bashed any presidents kid that I know of.
> Reread the last oost. He said Rush, as in :imbaugh, who went on a crisade
> about Chelesea Clinton when she was 13. He ridiculed her school assignments
> and even called her the White House dog on his tv show.
> The idiot denied he did that on his radio show until the tpe was played
> back.
He then blamed it on someone in the studio and said that they out up
the wrong picture. Unexplained is what picture was supposed to be shown,
why there was a picture of Chelsea in the studio and why the part was
not deleted since the show was taped.
> So, again, repuglicons attack a 13 year old girl for being smart and gawky
> vs democrats repeat teh truth that the adult ush girls are drinken sluts.
> BTW, it is repug;licons who are preaching values and family values, So what
> kind of values does this show?? What kind of parents were the Bushes who
> raised 2 drinken sluts?
> :arry
--
To reply via e-mail please delete 1 c from paccbell
Reply
jbeck Apr 18, 11:34 pm show options
Newsgroups: alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.rush-limbaugh
From: "jbeck" - Find messages by this author
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:34:48 -0600
Local: Mon,Apr 18 2005 11:34 pm
Subject: Re: Chelsea Clinton, Amy Carter, and the Bush Sluts
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
>> Did what?
>> I have never bashed any presidents kid that I know of.
> Reread the last oost. He said Rush, as in :imbaugh, who went on a crisade
> about Chelesea Clinton when she was 13. He ridiculed her school
> assignments
> and even called her the White House dog on his tv show.
Your typing would indicate a few too many beers there Larry ;-)
> The idiot denied he did that on his radio show until the tpe was played
> back.
> So, again, repuglicons attack a 13 year old girl for being smart and gawky
> vs democrats repeat teh truth that the adult ush girls are drinken sluts.
> BTW, it is repug;licons who are preaching values and family values, So
> what
> kind of values does this show?? What kind of parents were the Bushes who
> raised 2 drinken sluts?
> :arry
So, you are mad because of the attacks on Chelsea (which, I am of the
opinion should not have happened, and hold those people to the same
standard). And thus, because of those attacks, you think it is right to
attack Bush's daughters? Accuse them of being sluts?
I disagree. The kids aren't directly involved, and thus should be left
alone. Kids should have a chance to be kids.
Reply
Mitchell Holman Apr 18, 8:58 am show options
Newsgroups: alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.rush-limbaugh
From: Mitchell Holman - Find messages by this author
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:58:20 -0500
Local: Mon,Apr 18 2005 8:58 am
Subject: Re: Chelsea Clinton, Amy Carter, and the Bush Sluts
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
"jbeck" wrote in
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
news:4263387c@nntp.zianet.com:
>
>> The irony or should I say the Hypocrisy with these liberals here
>> bashing the Bush daughters is, if no one ever heard anything about them
>> at all, these same liberals would be saying they are quintessential
>> oddities and don't experience life as most normal American kids growing
>> up do. So in other words, liberals will bash anything that make them
>> think they've hung an albatross around W's neck. But then again that's
>> only their delusional perceptions which has nothing to do with reality!
> I think you are absolutely correct. No matter what, they are going to
> bash anything and everything associated, even remotely, with President
> Bush.
> I have little personal respect for those who attack the kids of someone.
> I think it is pretty pathetic on their part. It shows their lack of
> ethics, chivalry, or what have you to attack the children of those they
> disdain.
Funny I didn't see you here defending Chelsea
when Rush was picking on her and his "White House
Doq" schtick.
Reply
jbeck Apr 18, 9:47 am show options
Newsgroups: alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.rush-limbaugh
From: "jbeck" - Find messages by this author
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:47:53 -0600
Local: Mon,Apr 18 2005 9:47 am
Subject: Re: Chelsea Clinton, Amy Carter, and the Bush Sluts
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
news:Xns963C511A8BA04ta2eene2@216.196.97.131...
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> "jbeck" wrote in news:4263387c@nntp.zianet.com:
>>
>>> The irony or should I say the Hypocrisy with these liberals here
>>> bashing the Bush daughters is, if no one ever heard anything about them
>>> at all, these same liberals would be saying they are quintessential
>>> oddities and don't experience life as most normal American kids growing
>>> up do. So in other words, liberals will bash anything that make them
>>> think they've hung an albatross around W's neck. But then again that's
>>> only their delusional perceptions which has nothing to do with reality!
>> I think you are absolutely correct. No matter what, they are going to
>> bash anything and everything associated, even remotely, with President
>> Bush.
>> I have little personal respect for those who attack the kids of someone.
>> I think it is pretty pathetic on their part. It shows their lack of
>> ethics, chivalry, or what have you to attack the children of those they
>> disdain.
> Funny I didn't see you here defending Chelsea
> when Rush was picking on her and his "White House
> Doq" schtick.
Didn't see it. Didn't hear about it. When was that?
Reply
Lamont Cranston Apr 18, 10:43 am show options
Newsgroups: alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.rush-limbaugh
From: Lamont Cranston - Find messages by this author
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:43:59 GMT
Local: Mon,Apr 18 2005 10:43 am
Subject: Re: Chelsea Clinton, Amy Carter, and the Bush Sluts
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
jbeck wrote:
> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
> news:Xns963C511A8BA04ta2eene2@216.196.97.131...
>>"jbeck" wrote in news:4263387c@nntp.zianet.com:
>>>
>>>>The irony or should I say the Hypocrisy with these liberals here
>>>>bashing the Bush daughters is, if no one ever heard anything about them
>>>>at all, these same liberals would be saying they are quintessential
>>>>oddities and don't experience life as most normal American kids growing
>>>>up do. So in other words, liberals will bash anything that make them
>>>>think they've hung an albatross around W's neck. But then again that's
>>>>only their delusional perceptions which has nothing to do with reality!
>>>I think you are absolutely correct. No matter what, they are going to
>>>bash anything and everything associated, even remotely, with President
>>>Bush.
>>>I have little personal respect for those who attack the kids of someone.
>>> I think it is pretty pathetic on their part. It shows their lack of
>>>ethics, chivalry, or what have you to attack the children of those they
>>>disdain.
>> Funny I didn't see you here defending Chelsea
>>when Rush was picking on her and his "White House
>>Doq" schtick.
> Didn't see it. Didn't hear about it. When was that?
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/inaug/players/chelsea...
16 Candles for Chelsea
By Roxanne Roberts
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 27, 1996; Page D01
She's sweet, she's 16, and she's the only child of the president of the United
States.
...
Still, "Saturday Night Live" saw fit to air a sketch that compared Chelsea, then
13, unfavorably with Vice President Gore's daughter. The first lady was furious
about that, and even angrier when Rush Limbaugh took this shot: "Everyone knows
the Clintons have a cat," said Limbaugh. "Socks is the White House cat. But did
you know there is also a White House dog?" And he held up a picture of Chelsea.
Here and here.
Google is helping me find more, brand new examples of those lies (from a message board, now defunct, on cakewalk.com):
"I honestly don't know if he did it on the radio, but my dad watched him every day on TV, and believe me, the "White House Dog" comment occurred at least once per week-- essentially any commentary that referred to her"
Er, fella. Rush never said it once, much less "at least once per week."
Here on usenet, note this thread in which all the leftists contradict each other with different descriptions of the same oincident! One of which contradicts himself in one post!
From: "Larry Hewitt"
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 20:03:43 -0400
Local: Mon,Apr 18 2005 8:03 pm
Subject: Re: Chelsea Clinton, Amy Carter, and the Bush Sluts
He said Rush, as in :imbaugh, who went on a crisade about Chelesea Clinton when she was 13. He ridiculed her school assignments and even called her the White House dog on his tv show.
The idiot denied he did that on his radio show until the tpe was played back.
So, again, repuglicons attack a 13 year old girl for being smart and gawky vs democrats repeat teh truth that the adult ush girls are drinken sluts.
BTW, it is repug;licons who are preaching values and family values, So what kind of values does this show?? What kind of parents were the Bushes who raised 2 drinken sluts
Did it on his radio show or tv show? Um, excuse me Larry? Can you make up your mind? And Larry, you're a liar. Rush did not deny the incident in question took place, nor did anyone contradict him with a replay of a tape of either show.
Here's more. Note that one post, by George Grapman" points out that a photo was shown of chelsea, and a few more posts down, "Lamont Cranston" contradicts this with a claim that Rush held up the photo. These leftists just cant keep their lies straight.
George Grapman Apr 18, 8:13 pm show options
Newsgroups: alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.rush-limbaugh
From: George Grapman
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:13:38 GMT
Local: Mon,Apr 18 2005 8:13 pm
Subject: Re: Chelsea Clinton, Amy Carter, and the Bush Sluts
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Larry Hewitt wrote:
> "jbeck"
> news:4263ba6b@nntp.zianet.com...
>>"c-bee1"
>>news:u0O8e.26173$8Z6.18430@attbi_s21...
>>>"jbeck"
>>>news:4263387c@nntp.zianet.com...
>>>>
>>>>>The irony or should I say the Hypocrisy with these liberals here
>>>>>bashing
>>>>>the Bush daughters is, if no one ever heard anything about them at
> all,
>>>>>these same liberals would be saying they are quintessential oddities
>>>>>and
>>>>>don't experience life as most normal American kids growing up do. So
> in
>>>>>other words, liberals will bash anything that make them think they've
>>>hung
>>>>>an albatross around W's neck. But then again that's only their
>>>delusional
>>>>>perceptions which has nothing to do with reality!
>>>>I think you are absolutely correct. No matter what, they are going to
>>>bash
>>>>anything and everything associated, even remotely, with President Bush.
>>>>I have little personal respect for those who attack the kids of
> someone.
>>>I
>>>>think it is pretty pathetic on their part. It shows their lack of
>>>>ethics,
>>>>chivalry, or what have you to attack the children of those they
> disdain.
>>> Probably a parody on Rush, who did so repeatedly and then lied about it
>>>with a grin on his face. Of course, republicans had no problem when
> that
>>>happened.
>>Did what?
>>I have never bashed any presidents kid that I know of.
> Reread the last oost. He said Rush, as in :imbaugh, who went on a crisade
> about Chelesea Clinton when she was 13. He ridiculed her school assignments
> and even called her the White House dog on his tv show.
> The idiot denied he did that on his radio show until the tpe was played
> back.
He then blamed it on someone in the studio and said that they out up
the wrong picture. Unexplained is what picture was supposed to be shown,
why there was a picture of Chelsea in the studio and why the part was
not deleted since the show was taped.
> So, again, repuglicons attack a 13 year old girl for being smart and gawky
> vs democrats repeat teh truth that the adult ush girls are drinken sluts.
> BTW, it is repug;licons who are preaching values and family values, So what
> kind of values does this show?? What kind of parents were the Bushes who
> raised 2 drinken sluts?
> :arry
--
To reply via e-mail please delete 1 c from paccbell
Reply
jbeck Apr 18, 11:34 pm show options
Newsgroups: alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.rush-limbaugh
From: "jbeck"
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:34:48 -0600
Local: Mon,Apr 18 2005 11:34 pm
Subject: Re: Chelsea Clinton, Amy Carter, and the Bush Sluts
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
>> Did what?
>> I have never bashed any presidents kid that I know of.
> Reread the last oost. He said Rush, as in :imbaugh, who went on a crisade
> about Chelesea Clinton when she was 13. He ridiculed her school
> assignments
> and even called her the White House dog on his tv show.
Your typing would indicate a few too many beers there Larry ;-)
> The idiot denied he did that on his radio show until the tpe was played
> back.
> So, again, repuglicons attack a 13 year old girl for being smart and gawky
> vs democrats repeat teh truth that the adult ush girls are drinken sluts.
> BTW, it is repug;licons who are preaching values and family values, So
> what
> kind of values does this show?? What kind of parents were the Bushes who
> raised 2 drinken sluts?
> :arry
So, you are mad because of the attacks on Chelsea (which, I am of the
opinion should not have happened, and hold those people to the same
standard). And thus, because of those attacks, you think it is right to
attack Bush's daughters? Accuse them of being sluts?
I disagree. The kids aren't directly involved, and thus should be left
alone. Kids should have a chance to be kids.
Reply
Mitchell Holman Apr 18, 8:58 am show options
Newsgroups: alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.rush-limbaugh
From: Mitchell Holman
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:58:20 -0500
Local: Mon,Apr 18 2005 8:58 am
Subject: Re: Chelsea Clinton, Amy Carter, and the Bush Sluts
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
"jbeck"
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
news:4263387c@nntp.zianet.com:
>
>> The irony or should I say the Hypocrisy with these liberals here
>> bashing the Bush daughters is, if no one ever heard anything about them
>> at all, these same liberals would be saying they are quintessential
>> oddities and don't experience life as most normal American kids growing
>> up do. So in other words, liberals will bash anything that make them
>> think they've hung an albatross around W's neck. But then again that's
>> only their delusional perceptions which has nothing to do with reality!
> I think you are absolutely correct. No matter what, they are going to
> bash anything and everything associated, even remotely, with President
> Bush.
> I have little personal respect for those who attack the kids of someone.
> I think it is pretty pathetic on their part. It shows their lack of
> ethics, chivalry, or what have you to attack the children of those they
> disdain.
Funny I didn't see you here defending Chelsea
when Rush was picking on her and his "White House
Doq" schtick.
Reply
jbeck Apr 18, 9:47 am show options
Newsgroups: alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.rush-limbaugh
From: "jbeck"
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:47:53 -0600
Local: Mon,Apr 18 2005 9:47 am
Subject: Re: Chelsea Clinton, Amy Carter, and the Bush Sluts
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
"Mitchell Holman"
news:Xns963C511A8BA04ta2eene2@216.196.97.131...
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> "jbeck"
>>
>>> The irony or should I say the Hypocrisy with these liberals here
>>> bashing the Bush daughters is, if no one ever heard anything about them
>>> at all, these same liberals would be saying they are quintessential
>>> oddities and don't experience life as most normal American kids growing
>>> up do. So in other words, liberals will bash anything that make them
>>> think they've hung an albatross around W's neck. But then again that's
>>> only their delusional perceptions which has nothing to do with reality!
>> I think you are absolutely correct. No matter what, they are going to
>> bash anything and everything associated, even remotely, with President
>> Bush.
>> I have little personal respect for those who attack the kids of someone.
>> I think it is pretty pathetic on their part. It shows their lack of
>> ethics, chivalry, or what have you to attack the children of those they
>> disdain.
> Funny I didn't see you here defending Chelsea
> when Rush was picking on her and his "White House
> Doq" schtick.
Didn't see it. Didn't hear about it. When was that?
Reply
Lamont Cranston Apr 18, 10:43 am show options
Newsgroups: alt.impeach.bush, alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.rush-limbaugh
From: Lamont Cranston
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:43:59 GMT
Local: Mon,Apr 18 2005 10:43 am
Subject: Re: Chelsea Clinton, Amy Carter, and the Bush Sluts
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
jbeck wrote:
> "Mitchell Holman"
> news:Xns963C511A8BA04ta2eene2@216.196.97.131...
>>"jbeck"
>>>
>>>>The irony or should I say the Hypocrisy with these liberals here
>>>>bashing the Bush daughters is, if no one ever heard anything about them
>>>>at all, these same liberals would be saying they are quintessential
>>>>oddities and don't experience life as most normal American kids growing
>>>>up do. So in other words, liberals will bash anything that make them
>>>>think they've hung an albatross around W's neck. But then again that's
>>>>only their delusional perceptions which has nothing to do with reality!
>>>I think you are absolutely correct. No matter what, they are going to
>>>bash anything and everything associated, even remotely, with President
>>>Bush.
>>>I have little personal respect for those who attack the kids of someone.
>>> I think it is pretty pathetic on their part. It shows their lack of
>>>ethics, chivalry, or what have you to attack the children of those they
>>>disdain.
>> Funny I didn't see you here defending Chelsea
>>when Rush was picking on her and his "White House
>>Doq" schtick.
> Didn't see it. Didn't hear about it. When was that?
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/inaug/players/chelsea...
16 Candles for Chelsea
By Roxanne Roberts
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 27, 1996; Page D01
She's sweet, she's 16, and she's the only child of the president of the United
States.
...
Still, "Saturday Night Live" saw fit to air a sketch that compared Chelsea, then
13, unfavorably with Vice President Gore's daughter. The first lady was furious
about that, and even angrier when Rush Limbaugh took this shot: "Everyone knows
the Clintons have a cat," said Limbaugh. "Socks is the White House cat. But did
you know there is also a White House dog?" And he held up a picture of Chelsea.
