Wednesday, October 25, 2006

And ANOTHER lying liberal blogger

Over here (sorry about the bad formatting on that post), I talk about how liberals lie about what Rush said and did on a specific episode of his tv show so many years ago and go into great depth with many examples.

And here is one liberal blogger who repeats the phony information. When he is corrected in the comments section of his blog:


"This is the guy who held up a picture of Chelsea Clinton and called her a dog, when she was still a young teen."

Didnt happen that way. Urban legend. Transcript below (and he didnt hold up any photos. All photos were flashed on video monitors)

Copyright 1992 Multimedia Entertainment, Inc.
RUSH LIMBAUGH
SHOW: RUSH LIMBAUGH (9:00 PM ET)
November 6, 1992, Friday 11:15 AM

LIMBAUGH: Thank you. This show's era of dominant influence is just beginning. We are now the sole voice of sanity, the sole voice of reason. We are the sole voice of opposition on all television. This is the only place you can tune to to get the truth of the opposition of the one-party dictatorial government that now will soon run America. Oh, I mean, we are only beginning to enjoy dominance and prosperity. Most of these things on the in-out list are not even funny, but a couple of them--one of them in particular is.

David Hinckley of--of the New York Daily News wrote this, and what he has--he's got--it's very strange. He says, In: A cute kid in the White House. Out: Cute dog in the White House.' Could--could we see the cute kid? Let's take a look at--see who is the cute kid in the White House.

(A picture is shown of Millie the dog)

LIMBAUGH: (Voiceover) No, no, no. That's not the kid.

(Picture shown of Chelsea Clinton)

LIMBAUGH: (Voiceover) That's--that's the kid. We're trying to...



He responds with the following:


Steve Fine said...
Donvan McNabb is not one of the best Quarterbacks in football? Are you on oxycontin too? Go to www.nfl.com and check his stats (or maybe they are just faked by the pro-black conspriracy that pervades our society).

Urban Myth about the Chelsea Clinton story? B.S. Saw it with my own eyes when it happened. It does not surprise me that he lies about it on his website though.



Here is his blogger profile:

_________________________

Gender: male
Industry: Law
Occupation: Attorney
Location: Columbia : Maryland
_________________________

Well, well, well. An Attorney. From Maryland. A lying liberal attorney from Maryland. Will wonders never cease?

UPDATE: Here is a response to his comment:


"Urban Myth about the Chelsea Clinton story? B.S. Saw it with my own eyes when it happened."

I knew...knew...KNEW...that was going to be your response! Everytime someone like you brings up this chelsea/dog/limbaugh story and someone like me comes along and corrects the story, the response is usually: "I saw it with my own eyes." I WISH I had a nickel everytime a Limbaugh critic gives that lying response. I'd be a very wealthy man today. Now, I can believe that liberals watched Rush's show from time to time. Caught an episode here and there. But it's amazing how all of you coincidentally saw that one same episode, when at the time many liberals swore off watching the show. Heck, I watched Rush's show. Never missed an episode, and no such thing ever happened. But hey, if I'm wrong, show us the transcript, or better yet, the video clip (upload it to your blog and/or youtube):

Order transcript of any show: 1-800-777-TEXT
Order TV Cassettes: 1-800-678-7491
Rush Merchandise catalog: 1-702-353-3550

http://www.rosecity.net/rush/contact.html

You could have done the honest thing, admitted that you saw the story somewhere on the internet, and wrongfully assumed it was true. But no, you had to be dishonest and claim you saw it with your own eyes. In reality, you saw nothing.

"It does not surprise me that he lies about it on his website though."

Don't know what you're talking about. It's not on his website as far as I can see (I'm not a registered member there, so I can't accesss the good stuff). The transcript is archived on Lexis-Nexis.

website statistics


Comments:
I don't know about the TV show, as I didn't have TV at the time, but in about 1995 I heard Rush refer to Chelsea as "ugly" on the radio. Not heard about it; heard it. That was when I quit listening to him, as it made me furious. And I'm not a lying liberal attorney; I'm a little right of Rush, if anything. (I don't recall the exact date, so I wouldn't know if there are transcripts available. I would suspect not.)

I still think it was below the belt to goad her parents by insulting a teenage girl's looks. The president was fair game (and below the belt was just about right for him), but Chelsea should have been off-limits. Especially given the insecurities ALL teenage girls have about their looks.
 
Did I give offense with my comment on this yesterday, or did it just not post? I had no intention of being rude; I merely had information that I felt was relevant. If I was deleted, would you tell me, and I'll stay out of the discussion hereafter?
 
"I heard Rush refer to Chelsea as "ugly" on the radio. Not heard about it; heard it."

Baloney. After the "incident", Rush made a promise to himself not to bring up Chelsea again if he could avoid it (that is if she wasnt mentioned in the news for a good reason). I too listened to Rush in 1995. Have been listening to him since Sept. 1990. Never heard him call CHelsea ugly.

And I'm not a lying liberal attorney;"

You're an attorney that I caught telling a lie.

"I'm a little right of Rush,"

Suuure you are.

"I still think it was below the belt to goad her parents by insulting a teenage girl's looks."

And again you lie.


"Did I give offense with my comment on this yesterday, or did it just not post?"

I had the comment moderation on, and not untill today did I realize it. Stupid me. I thought that peoples comments would automatically post. Ah well, its fixed now.
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?