Sunday, January 06, 2008
And Yet Another Anti-Limbaugh Liar On The Internet
On the somethingawful.com forums, we have someone going by the user name of "Repo Man".
First off, a post by someone by the name of "kilroy":
____________________________
Repo Man responds (on December 9, 2007):
_____________________________
________________________________________
Bwahahahahaha!!! :-) Man, what a LIAR this Repo Man is! He NEVER saw Limbaugh do it! This is not only a bad lie, its a clumsy lie. If the Rush Limbaugh show was seen by only a mere handful of people, then he could get away with claiming to have seen something that didnt happen. But because the show was watched by millions, myself included, there are millions of eyewitnesses to contradict him! The transcript is not from "another episode". It is the one and only incident from which this phony story grew!
And no one will ever put it up on youtube because one cannot put up an incident that never existed! Notice in all the years that people like Repo Man have been propping up this lie, NONE of them have come up with a transcript and/or, better yet, a video of this supposed incident that they claimed happen.
Repo Man: "The trouble is, I actually saw Limbaugh do this"
Trouble is, Mr. Repo Man, you're just a liar that saw NOTHING. And I won't bother pretending to give you a "nice try".
For reference purposes, here is the actual transcript:
RUSH LIMBAUGH
SHOW: RUSH LIMBAUGH (9:00 PM ET)
November 6, 1992, Friday 11:15 AM
LIMBAUGH: Thank you. This show's era of dominant influence is just beginning. We are now the sole voice of sanity, the sole voice of reason. We are the sole voice of opposition on all television. This is the only place you can tune to to get the truth of the opposition of the one-party dictatorial government that now will soon run America. Oh, I mean, we are only beginning to enjoy dominance and prosperity. Most of these things on the in-out list are not even funny, but a couple of them--one of them in particular is.
David Hinckley of--of the New York Daily News wrote this, and what he has--he's got--it's very strange. He says, In: A cute kid in the White House. Out: Cute dog in the White House.' Could--could we see the cute kid? Let's take a look at--see who is the cute kid in the White House.
(A picture is shown of Millie the dog)
LIMBAUGH: (Voiceover) No, no, no. That's not the kid.
(Picture shown of Chelsea Clinton)
LIMBAUGH: (Voiceover) That's--that's the kid. We're trying to...
First off, a post by someone by the name of "kilroy":
oh, and:
quote:
On November 6, 1992, three days after her father won the elections, when Chelsea was still in braces, Rush Limbaugh said the following on his television show: "Everyone knows the Clintons have a cat; Socks is the White House cat. But did you know there is also a White House dog?" He then pointed to a video monitor, which switched to a picture of Chelsea. Limbaugh has claimed that it was a technical error.
I know most here already know this but Jesus if there was ever someone who ought to be catapulted into the Sun it's that fat flop of poo poo. He chuckled and shook like a bowl full of jelly after the joke so it certainly wasn't an error.
____________________________
Repo Man responds (on December 9, 2007):
_____________________________
Kilroy posted:
oh, and:
I know most here already know this but Jesus if there was ever someone who ought to be catapulted into the Sun it's that fat flop of poo poo. He chuckled and shook like a bowl full of jelly after the joke so it certainly wasn't an error.
There is a nutjob going around saying this never happened, and using a transcript from another episode of Limbaugh's show to prove it. The trouble is, I actually saw Limbaugh do this, and it was no accident. I wish someone would put it up on YouTube.
Oh yeah, here he is editing the Wikipedia entry on Chelsea. Nice try, loser.
________________________________________
Bwahahahahaha!!! :-) Man, what a LIAR this Repo Man is! He NEVER saw Limbaugh do it! This is not only a bad lie, its a clumsy lie. If the Rush Limbaugh show was seen by only a mere handful of people, then he could get away with claiming to have seen something that didnt happen. But because the show was watched by millions, myself included, there are millions of eyewitnesses to contradict him! The transcript is not from "another episode". It is the one and only incident from which this phony story grew!
And no one will ever put it up on youtube because one cannot put up an incident that never existed! Notice in all the years that people like Repo Man have been propping up this lie, NONE of them have come up with a transcript and/or, better yet, a video of this supposed incident that they claimed happen.
Repo Man: "The trouble is, I actually saw Limbaugh do this"
Trouble is, Mr. Repo Man, you're just a liar that saw NOTHING. And I won't bother pretending to give you a "nice try".
For reference purposes, here is the actual transcript:
RUSH LIMBAUGH
SHOW: RUSH LIMBAUGH (9:00 PM ET)
November 6, 1992, Friday 11:15 AM
LIMBAUGH: Thank you. This show's era of dominant influence is just beginning. We are now the sole voice of sanity, the sole voice of reason. We are the sole voice of opposition on all television. This is the only place you can tune to to get the truth of the opposition of the one-party dictatorial government that now will soon run America. Oh, I mean, we are only beginning to enjoy dominance and prosperity. Most of these things on the in-out list are not even funny, but a couple of them--one of them in particular is.
David Hinckley of--of the New York Daily News wrote this, and what he has--he's got--it's very strange. He says, In: A cute kid in the White House. Out: Cute dog in the White House.' Could--could we see the cute kid? Let's take a look at--see who is the cute kid in the White House.
(A picture is shown of Millie the dog)
LIMBAUGH: (Voiceover) No, no, no. That's not the kid.
(Picture shown of Chelsea Clinton)
LIMBAUGH: (Voiceover) That's--that's the kid. We're trying to...
Labels: chelsea, chelsea clinton, clinton, limbaugh, rush, rush limbaugh
Sunday, June 17, 2007
More Deceit From Media Matters
Deceit may be a harsh word. In this post I document how "Media Matters" gets it wrong about Rush Limbaugh. Their mistake was using FAIR as a source.
Ah, they acknowledge that Rush refered to the story as a rumor, but neglect to mention that Rush derided the fax, and the story as a hoax. Rush's major point overall was how the Clintons could put all these rumors to rest if they just came forward and told the truth. But they would not. Instead stonewalling, lying, and obstructing any attempts to investigate what really happened. Their actions only caused the rumors to multiply and swell up.
Well, again they use FAIR as a source to criticize Rush Limbaugh, little knowing that FAIR is deliberately being deceitful.
It revolves around a radio broadcast that Rush made in 1994. Now, being a daily listener at the time, I was listening to that particular program as it occured. Rumors were swirling around about what really happened to Vince Foster. And some moron tried to mislead Limbaugh by sending him a fax. He read the fax on the air, but later derided the fax as a phony (Rush: "I'll give you ten to one odds that this fax is a fake!")
However, FAIR, and consequently Media Matters, leaves that part of Rush's broadcast out of their reports. Thereby taking it completely out of context and lying by ommission.
Media Matters:
according to a report by the national media watch group Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR):
On his March 10 radio broadcast, Limbaugh had announced the following in urgent tones:
OK, folks, I think I got enough information here to tell you about the contents of this fax that I got. Brace yourselves. This fax contains information that I have just been told will appear in a newsletter to Morgan Stanley sales personnel this afternoon. ... What it is is a bit of news which says ... there's a Washington consulting firm that has scheduled the release of a report that will appear, it will be published, that claims that Vince Foster was murdered in an apartment owned by Hillary Clinton, and the body was then taken to Fort Marcy Park.
After he returned from a commercial break, Limbaugh began referring to the story as a "rumor," but continued to claim that the story was that "the Vince Foster suicide was not a suicide."
Ah, they acknowledge that Rush refered to the story as a rumor, but neglect to mention that Rush derided the fax, and the story as a hoax. Rush's major point overall was how the Clintons could put all these rumors to rest if they just came forward and told the truth. But they would not. Instead stonewalling, lying, and obstructing any attempts to investigate what really happened. Their actions only caused the rumors to multiply and swell up.
